High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6048/2015disposed of

Rajendra Babu v. Secretary, Rta, Thiruvananthapuram (Rural)

2015-02-25Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/6TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6048 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- RAJENDRA BABU, THODIYAN VEEDU, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR.P.O., KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (RURAL), ATTINGAL-695 101

2. ABDUL RASHEED, THENGUVILA VEEDU, THYCAUD.P.O., ANCHAL, KOLLAM-691 001 R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.6048/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE FOR TIMING CONFERENCE DATED 18/2/2015. P2 COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 6048 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 25th February, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The only prayer in the above writ petition is to consider the objection filed before the authority to the revision of timings of the 2nd respondent.

2. I heard both sides. If Ext.P2 objection is received in original in the office of the 1st respondent, necessarily the same shall be considered when the revision of timings of the 2nd respondent is taken for consideration, if not already considered.

Writ petition disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//