High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6159/2015disposed of

Rosamma Chacko v. District Collector

2015-02-26Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/7TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6159 of 2015 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- ROSAMMA CHACKO, AGED 42 YEARS MALLAPPALLIL HOUSE, VAYAKKAL P.O VALAKOM, KOTTARAKARA KOLLAM-691 532.

BY ADV. SRI.P.SHANES METHAR RESPONDENT(S):

-------------

1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 465.

2. THE ADDITIONAL THAHASILDAR, RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 465.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PAZHAVANGADI KARA VILLAGE RANNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 465.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6159 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)'S EXHIBITS:

---------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.3072/1967 OF SRO RANNY EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE DATED 19.12.2014 EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 5.1.2014 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.3.2014 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.5.2014 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL ---------------------- TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE Scl.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

--------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.6159 of 2015 ------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is stated as absolute owner of the property having an extent of 5 Acres in Survey No.170/1/1 of Pazhavangadykara Village as per Ext.P1 sale deed. After purchasing the property, the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 application before the third respondent for effecting mutation in terms of Transfer of Registry Rules. Despite the finding of Exts.P4 & P5 representations, no action is being taken and hence the writ petition.

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3.

After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider and finalize Ext.P3 application stated as preferred by the petitioner for effecting mutation. The proceedings as above shall be finalised in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at the earliest, at any rate, within

W.P.(C) No.6159 of 2015 -2- 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned respondent for further steps.

Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE Scl.