P.G.Jayakumar v. Corporation Of Cochin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/7TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6175 of 2015 (V) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:
1. P.G.JAYAKUMAR, S/O GANGADHARAN, AGED 47, PADATHARA HOUSE, WADIYAR LANE, KOCHI-17.
2. MOHANAN, S/O VELAYUDHAN, AGED 65, E.W.S.714, GANDHI NAGAR, KOCHI-20.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.CHARLES SRI.M.POLY MATHAI SRI.VIMAL K.CHARLES RESPONDENTS:
1. CORPORATION OF COCHIN REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, COCHIN-11.
2. COUNCIL OF COCHIN CORPORATION, KOCHI-11 REP. BY ITS CHAIR PERSON.
BY SRI.P.K.SOYUZ,SC,COCHIN CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN WPC 6175/15 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT. P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SAID ORDER DATED 5.2.2015 PASSED BY THE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE COCHIN CORPORATION ADDRESSED TO FIRST PETITIONER EXT. P1(a) A TRUE COPY OF ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P1 EXT. P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE FIRST PTITIONER BEFORE THE COCHIN CORPORATION EXT. P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE SECOND PTITIONER BEFORE THE COCHIN CORPORATION EXT. P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS TO THE FIRST PETITIONER EXT. P4(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P4 EXT. P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS TO THE SECOND PETITIONER EXT. P5(a) A TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXHIBIT P5 EXT. P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND STAY PETITION FILED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P2 EXT. P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT AND STAY PETITION FILED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER ALONG WITH EXHIBIT P2 /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.6175 of 2015 V -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
In the light of the ratio laid down in W.P.(C)No. 5456/2015, this Court, without adverting to the merits of the matter, disposes of the present writ petition with a direction to the respondent Corporation to consider Exhibits P2 and P3 appeals of the petitioners in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that once the appeals are disposed of, both the parties - the petitioners and the respondent Corporation - are at liberty to take necessary consequential or remedial steps based on the result of the appeals.
Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv