High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6236/2015disposed of

M/S.Salafi E.M.L.P.School,(Un Aided) Mathottam v. State Of Kerala

2015-03-18Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/27TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6236 of 2015 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- M/S.SALAFI E.M.L.P. SCHOOL, (UN AIDED), MATHOTTAM, ARAKINNAR P.O., KOZHIKODE -673 028, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. BY ADVS.SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR, SRI.M.RAHUL.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MANANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE- 673 001.

BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V. VIJULAL.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 6236 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT P1TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF GO DATED 20/02/2014. EXT P2TRUE COPY OF THE GO DATED 07/01/2014.

EXT P3TRUE COPY OF THE FITNESS CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION.

EXT P4TRUE COPY OF THE GO DATED 10/06/2013.

EXT P5TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTED SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.6236 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 18 th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner, an unaided Lower Primary School was given temporary recognition by the Government from 2003 onwards. According to the petitioner, since the school has been functioning from 1987, it is eligible for relaxation regarding the area norms and hence the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent for permanent recognition by Ext.P5.

2. The only request made by the petitioner before this Court is to consider Ext.P5 in the light of Ext.P4 Government Order.

3. In the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P5 representation, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if applicable, in the light of Ext.P4 Government Order. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE sj