High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6275/2015disposed of

Safeer P.A. v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-03-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6275 of 2015 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SAFEER P.A., PANDARA ARAKKAL HOUSE, WEST KODUR, KODUR, MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.ANUMOD B.NAIR.

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM , PIN- 676 505.

BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 6275 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 05-02-2015. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

==================================== W.P.(C)No.6275 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-10/V 7736 in the route Manjeri-Tirur. The timings of the service was last alloted on 24.4.2001, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 5.2.2015. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall, within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say the

W.P.(C)No.6275 of 2015 -:2:- petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular. Writ petition is disposed of as above.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

sl.