Xavier.X.Kallupurackal v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Alappuzha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6280 of 2015 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- XAVIER X.KALLUPURACKAL, OORAMVELIL KALLUPURACKAL, CHERUKOLE P.O., MAVELIKKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.ANUMOD B.NAIR.
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, PIN- 688 001.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R. RANJITH.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 6280 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 29-01-2015. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
==================================== W.P.(C)No.6280 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-31/13 in the route Mavelikkara-Thiruvalla. The timings of the service was last alloted on 20.10.2011, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 29.1.2015. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. Learned Government Pleader submits that notice was already issued to the petitioner and he did not appear on 3.2.2015. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall, within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner,
W.P.(C)No.6280 of 2015 -:2:- in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular. Writ petition is disposed of as above.
K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.
sl.