Priya Gopinath v. The Secretary, Rta, Kollam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6289 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- PRIYA GOPINATH, MUDAPPILANGAL THUNDIL HOUSE, KOTTAMKARA, MAMMOODU, CHANDANTHOPPU, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM - 691 001.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 6289 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.01.2015 IN W.P(C) NO.1863 OF 2015.
EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 13.02.2015.
EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT ON THE MODIFIED ROUTE WITH COVERING LETTER DATED 20.02.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
K. Vinod Chandran, J.
==================================== W.P.(C)No.6289 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2015.
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner's temporary permit application, though directed to be considered by Ext.P1, was rejected by Ext.P2, for reason of objectionable overlap of the scheme route. Petitioner is said to have now placed Ext.P3, a notified route, wherein, there is no objectionable overlap of any scheme route.
2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that the Field Officer's report is awaited. In such circumstances, the Field Officer's report shall be expedited and if necessary, KSRTC shall also be heard and temporary permit application considered, within a a period of three weeks from today.
Writ petition is disposed off.
K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.
sl.