High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6561/2014dismissed as infructuous

M/S. Hotel Wynad Regency Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-09Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2015/18TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 6561 of 2014 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------- M/S. HOTEL WYNAD REGENCY PVT. LTD.

KARADI, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR JAMES JOSEPH, S/O.MANIMALA CHACKO JOSEPH, MANIMALA HOUSE, MANANTHAVADY P.O WAYANAD, PIN-670 645 BY ADVS.SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM SMT.MERCIAMMA MATHEW SRI.V.RENJITH KUMAR SRI.ASWIN.P.JOHN RESPONDENTS:

-------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM 695 001.

2. SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT TRIVANDRUM 695 001.

3. COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, TRIVANDRUM 695 001.

4. ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER KOZHIKODE 673 001.

5. DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOZHIKODE 673 001.

6. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KOZHIKODE 673 001.

7. SUB-COLLECTOR KOZHIKODE 673 001

8. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, KOZHIKODE 673 573.

9. TAHSILDAR, THAMARASSERY

W.P.(C) No. 6561/2014 : 2 :

KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 573.

10. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THAMARASSERY POLICE STATION, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 573.

11. BASHEER, S/O.MUHAMMED CONVENER, THAMARASSERY-KAARADI BAR VIRUDHA SAMARA SAMITHI, RESIDING AT KURUMTHOTTIKANDI HOUSE, RAROTHAMSOM, KAARADI, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE - 673 573.

R11 BY ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR R1-R4 BY ADV. SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 6561 of 2014 U ---------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner has represented that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Court dismisses the writ petition as infructuous. sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

/True Copy/ P.A to Judge.