Thalakkottupurath Pathumma v. The Thahasildar, Nilambur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2015/11TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6423 of 2015 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
1. THALAKKOTTUPURATH PATHUMMA, D/O.ABDULLAKKUTTY, ENANTHI, KARULAI, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. THALAKKOTTUPURATH MOHAMMED, S/O.ABDULLAKKUTTY, ENANTHI, KARULAI, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.RAJENDRAN SRI.M.S.MOHAMMED ANSARY RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE THAHASILDAR, NILAMBUR - 679 329.
2. MUNDAMBRA KHADEEJA, W/O.PARAPPURAVAN ALI, KARULAI, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679 330. R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 6423 of 2015 (C) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- P1:- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11/3/1991 IN CRRP NO.1553 OF 1984 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
P2:- TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 9/7/1996 IN OS NO.461/92 OF THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI.
P3:- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14/2/2012 FILED BY THE IST PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT.
P4:- TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 18/6/2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE IST PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
----------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.6423 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers:
"a. direct the 1st respondent by the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to accept the Land Tax from the petitioners in respect of their 1 acre and 36 cents of land in R.S.No.137/5 of Karulai village in Nilambur Taluk.
b. direct the 1st respondent by the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to consider Ext.P3 representation in the light of Ext.P1 and P2 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the grievance of the petitioners has also been projected by way of Ext.P3 representation and that the petitioners will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the first respondent to have it considered and finalized within a reasonable time.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. In view of the limited extent of relief sought for and proposed to be given, this Court does not find it necessary to
W.P.(C).No.6423 of 2015 deal with the merits of the case or to issue notice to the 2nd respondent.
4. After hearing both the sides, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, 2nd respondent and other interested parties, if any, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this this judgment. The petitioners shall produce a copy of the judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition, before the first respondent, for further steps.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
rkc.