High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6433/2015disposed of

The General Manager v. State Of Kerala

2015-02-27Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/8TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6433 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- THE GENERAL MANAGER, THE CHANGANACHERRY CO-OP. URBAN BANK LTD. NO. 3195 P.B. NO. 21, CHANGANACHERRY- 686 101 - KOTTAYAM BY ADVS.SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE SRI.M.V.BIPIN RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.

THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 002 3.

THANKACHAN ZACHARIAS, KANNADY THUNDIYIL, NORTH OF BISHOP PALACE, CHANGANACHERRY - 686 101 4.

JOSEPH PHILIP, OLASSAEIL HOUSE, KURISUMMOODU P.O.

CHANGANASSERY 686 104 R1 & R2 BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. D. SOMASUNDARAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6433 of 2015 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

COPY OF THE ORDER NO. O/6368/14/KDIS DATED 25.09.2014 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT P2:

COPY OF THE APPEAL ALONG WITH STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BANK UNDER SECTION 83(1)(j) OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT P3:

COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION MADE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.01.2015 VIDE NO. 13218/P.S2/2014/CO-OP. SEEKING FACTUAL REPORT P4:

COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.02.2015 VIDE NO. C.R.B. 8422/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 6433 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The cancellation of registration given to the amended bye-laws is challenged in an appeal. Ext. P2 appeal filed against Ext. P1 order is still pending consideration with the first respondent.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext. P2 appeal with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE