High Court of KeralaWP(C)/16876/2005dismissed

K.V.Unnikrishnan v. Commissioner,Hr & C.E.,Kozhikode

2015-12-01Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.16876 of 2005 (H) -------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.V. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O. LATE SEKHARA WARRIAR, AGED 37 YEARS, RESIDING AT KARUMNASSERY GRAMAM, KIZHAKKENCHERRY PANCHAYATH, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN SRI.BABY MATHEW.

RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------

1. THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOVEMENT OFFICE, KOZHIKODE.

2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOVEMENT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD.

3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ADDITIONAL CHRAGE, SREE KRISHNAMOORTHY AYYAPPAN DEVASWOM KSHETHRAM, KARUMANASSERY, KIZHAKKENCHERRY, ALATHUR TALUK.

R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.FAIZAL P.LATHEEF R3 BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

WP(C).No.16876 of 2005-H -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.01.2004 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------ NIL.

Vku/- [ true copy ]

K. Vinod Chandran, J -------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.16876 of 2005-H -------------------------------------- Dated this the 01st day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks payment of salary for his engagement as "Kazhakam" as per G.O.(MS) No.415/96/RD dated 06.08.1996. The petitioner's claim for salary is from 01.01.1995. The writ petition is of the year 2005. The petitioner also, in the writ petition, submits that he has gone out of service on 30.09.2000, voluntarily. In such circumstance, a writ petition for such a claim cannot be entertained. However, the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that the entire money has been paid. In any event, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/- [ true copy ]