The Malappuram District Poura Samithi v. The Agrl. Production Commissioner And
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/24TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10162 of 2008 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- THE MALAPPURAM DISTRICT POURA SAMITHY/ PARISTHITHI SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHI, VADAKKEMANA P.O.KODOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 505, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY M.K.HAMZA HAJI.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.) SRI.T.RAMPRASAD UNNI SMT.SMITHA GEORGE SRI.M.H.HANIS RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION COMMISSIONER, (HE DELEGATES HIS POWER TO SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURAL NCA DEPARTMENT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, AGRICULTURAL (NCA) DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURAL (NCA) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ
WP(C).No. 10162 of 2008 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DT.8/1/2008 IN WPC.36305/2007 P2 - TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DT.11/1/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER P3 - TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT.27/2/08 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER P4 - TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT.6//3/2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL P5 - TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DT.14/3/2007 SUBMITTED BY THE CLERK OF THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL P6 - TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DT.3/11/2007 ISSUED BY R2 TO THE CLERK OF THE PETIONER'S CLERK P7 - TRUE COPY OF COMMUNICATION DT.10/3/2008 BY R2 TO THE CLERK OF THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.
/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 10162 of 2008 ================== Dated this the 15th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner challenging Ext.P7 has approached this Court. By Ext.P7, petitioner's request for releasing certain documents under Right to Information Act has been rejected.
2.
In Para 2 of the counter affidavit, it is stated as follows: "The petitioner filed an appeal before the Hon'ble State Information Commission, against this. The Hon'ble State Information Commission vide its order No.10462/SIC-G3/07 dated 19.6.08 has directed the respondents to furnish the copies of the information sought for by the applicant. Thus the entire information that were requested by the applicant has been furnished to him vide Government letter No.9881/NCA3/AD dated 28.06.2008." 3.
In view of the above, the writ petition is closed. sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE