Muhammed Kutty v. The Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/14TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No.6542 of 2015 (P) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- MUHAMMED KUTTY,NALAKATH, KALATHIL HOUSE, CHELEMBRA,MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.ANUMOD B.NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM,RERPESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 676 505.

2.

THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM - 676 505.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.6542 of 2015 (P) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ EXHIBIT-P1:TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT HOLDING BY THE PETITIONER ON THE ROUTE VAZHAYAR - FEROKE VALID UPTO 16/02/2016.

EXHIBIT-P2:TRUE COPY OF THE VARIATION APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 08/12/2014.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.6542 of 2015 - P ====================== Dated this the 5th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks for consideration of an application for variation of permit.

The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that, even the fees has not been remitted and the same has been intimated to the petitioner. In such circumstance, no mandamus can be issued.

The writ petition would stand dismissed.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge