G. Sudarshan Pillai v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2015/19TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10355 of 2012 (T) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER : - -------------------------- G. SUDARSHAN PILLAI, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O GOPALA PILLAI, AMMACHI VEEDU, KAIKULANGARA WARD, KOLLAM-691 012.

BY ADVS.SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.S.SREEDEV RESPONDENTS : - ---------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. PIN:695001.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695001.

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, EXCISE BHAVAN, KOLLAM, 691 001.

4. BINU JOSE,, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O JOE MATHEW, MANAKKATTU HOUSE, PALA P.O., KOTTAYAM, PIN:686 975.

ADDL. R5 TO R13 ADDL R5. LAZHAR CHAKKOLA, MISSION QUARTERS, FATHIMA NAGAR, THRISSUR - 5.

ADDL R6. A. KOMALAVALLI, GETHA NIVAS, AMBAL, VALIYAKUNNU P.O., VALANCHERRY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

WP(C).No. 10355 of 2012 (T) ------------------------------------ ADDL R7. M. ARAVINDAKSHAN, MALAYATIL HOUSE, ADHAVANAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

ADDL R8. K. VIJAYAN, LEKSHMI, PARAMBILANGAODI, KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

ADDL R9. LIJO CHACKOLA, CHAKOLA HOUSE, MISSION QUARTERS, FATHAMA NAGAR, THRISSUR -5.

ADDL R10. B. PUSHPAVALLY, W/o K. NANDANAN, "ANJALI", THATTAMALA P.O., KOLLAM.

ADDL R11. T.M. SETHUMADHAVAN, MAVANCHERY HOUSE, THANNUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

ADDL R12. P. MOIDEEN, PUNNAKKODAN HOUSE, PALACHIRAMAD, PERUMANNA, EDARIKODE P.O.

ADDL R13. M. JANARDHANAN, MALAYATTIL HOUSE, ADHAVANAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

(ADDL R5 TO R13 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 15.10.2012 IN I.A. No. 6449/12).

R4 BY ADV. SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE R4 BY ADV. SRI.JAI GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 10355 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner reports that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Court dismisses the writ petition as infructuous. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-