Madhavan v. Union Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/3RD CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16993 of 2005 (W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- MADHAVAN, KAIPANCHERY HOUSE, P.O. NEDUMPURA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------

1. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, MODEL REGIONAL OFFICE UNION BANK BHAVAN, 2ND FLOOR, M.G. ROAD ERNAKULAM.

2. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, IRINAJALAKUDA BRANCH, IRINJALAKUDA THRISSUR DISTRICT.

3. ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICER, ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM.

4. ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICER, ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICE, THRISSUR.

5. K. SREEKUMAR, KIZHUVEETIL HOUSE, P.O. POTTURE, MULAMKUNNATHUKAVU, THRISSUR DISTRICT. R1,2 BY ADV. SRI.A.S.P.KURUP, SC R3 & 4 BY SRI.JOHN VARGHESE, ASSISTANT SG R5 BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.16993 of 2005 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 24th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

This writ petition is filed in the year 2005 challenging appointment of the party respondent as Armed Guard in the second respondent-Bank. Considering the nature of the relief sought, I am of the view that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms \\ true copy// P.S to Judge