P.B.Rajalakshmi v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/12TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No.6645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- P.B.RAJALAKSHMI,AGED 49 YEARS, WIFE OF DR.H RAVIKUMAR KAMMATH, HEADMISTRESS,T.D.TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE, MATTANCHERRY,KOCHI-682 002.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

3.

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM AT KAKKANAD-682 030.

4.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ERNAKULAM-682 011.

5.

THE MANAGER,T.D CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, MATTANCHERRY,KOCHI-682 002.

R1 TO R4 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.6645 of 2015 (E) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 1-04-2014.

EXHIBIT P2:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B6/1957/14/K.DIS DATED 29-10-2014 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3:TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 12-11-2014 WITHOUT ANNEXURE. EXHIBIT P4:TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO.254/2014/G.EDN DATED 17-1-2014 OF THE GOVERNMENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.6645 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March,2015

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------- The petitioner approached the Deputy Director of Education as per Ext.P3 on being aggrieved by the rejection of approval of appointment by Ext.P2, an order passed by the District Educational Officer. The limited request of the petitioner is an early disposal of Ext.P3. 2.

Considering the pendency of Ext.P3, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 within a period of two months after affording an opportunity of hearing the petitioner and all affected parties.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/ A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE jm/