High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6817/2015disposed of

Vijaya Kumar v. The Managing Director, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-03-04Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/13TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6817 of 2015 (B) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED 58 YEARS S/O JANARDHANAN PILLAI, LATHA NILAYAM, RAMANKULANGARA KOLLAM (EMPLOYEE WORKING AT K.S.R.T.C PUNALUR). BY ADVS.SRI.PRATHEESH.P SMT.S.SEETHA RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION DEPOT KOLLAM-691001.

3. THE ASST. TRANSPORT OFFICER, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, PUNALUR KOLLAM-691305.

4. KOLLAM DISTRICT STATE TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.Q.76, KOLLAM-691001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

5. E.SHAJAHAN SHAJAHAN MANZIL, RAMANKULANGARA, KOLLAM-691003. R BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6817 of 2015 (B) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED TO THE 3RD RESPONDNET DATED 16.8.2014.

EXHIBIT P2: THE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.31751/2007 DATED 2.6.2011. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 12.2.2014 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.6817 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 4th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner contends that the dues to the fourth respondent Society can as well be realised from the terminal benefits of the fifth respondent. The petitioner laments that he is after all a surety for the loan who could be proceeded against only if other avenues are not open. The petitioner has in this regard submitted Ext.P3 representation which is pending consideration with the second respondent.

2. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation with notice to the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5. The needful shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.