High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6822/2015closed

Abdul Hakkim v. Theh Inspector Of Police

2015-03-11Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Ag.Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6822 of 2015 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------

1. ABDUL HAKKIM AGED 55 YEARS S/O MUHAMMED NOOH, JAS MANZIL, PANGODE PO PANGODE VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM.

2. BEENA P.M.

S/O MUHAMMED JOOH, JAS MANZIL, PANGODE P.O.

PANGODE VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM.

BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THEH INSPECTOR OF POLICE CIRCLE OFFICE POLICE STATIO KILIMANOOR TRIVANDRUM-695501.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANGODE POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM-695501.

3. M.M.SHAFI S/O MUHAMMED ABDUL KHADER ANEX VEETTIL CHAVETTYKUZHIYIL PANGODE PO TGRIVANDRUM DISTRICT-695501.

R1 AND R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6822 of 2015 (C) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXHIBTI P1: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE IST RESPONDENT ON 4.2.2015.

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONERS TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 24.2.15.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No.6822 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th March, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, Ag, CJ.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to the third respondent, in view of the order, which is being passed.

2. The petitioners have filed this Writ Petition seeking adequate and effective police protection from the threat of the third respondent.

3. The learned Government Pleader, after obtaining instruction, submitted that the petitioners had earlier filed W.P(C).No.1603 of 2015 on the same allegations on the basis of same complaint, Exhibit P1, which was closed by this Court finding that there was no threat to the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader further submitted that now the petitioners have filed the same complaint before another Police Station.

WP(C).6822/15

4. Be that as it may, once on enquiry in Exhibit P1 complaint no threat was found, we see no reason to give any direction in the Writ Petition. However, it is open for the petitioners to file appropriate complaint before the Police, if any offence or attempt of offence is committed. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is closed.

ASHOK BHUSHAN ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE vgs11/3/15