High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6871/2015disposed of

Geroge Joseph v. The Manager, Sacred Heard High School

2015-03-04Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/13TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6871 of 2015 (H) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- GEROGE JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH, PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER SACRED HEART HIGH SCHOOL, KANTHALOOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON MANAYANI SRI.BENHUR JOSEPH MANAYANI SRI.JEEVAN MATHEW MANAYANI RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE MANAGER, SACRED HEART HIGH SCHOOL KANTHALLUR P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685020.

2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, (D.E.O) KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685110.

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (DD), THODUPUZHA P.O., IDUKKID DISTRICT-685623.

4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT TRIVANDRUM-695001.

R2-4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 6871 of 2015 (H) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3.5.2007 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE ORDR OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 22.11.2013 EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 6.8.2014 EXHIBIT P4TRUE OCY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10.2.2015 BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************** W.P.(C) No.6871 of 2015 ***************************************************** Dated this the 4th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The only prayer in this writ petition is that the period in which the petitioner was suspended has to be regularised for other service benefits. The petitioner moved respondents 2 and 3 by Ext.P4.

In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the first respondent within a period of two months. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln