← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6992/2015disposed of

Renjith.P.M v. The Secretary

2015-03-05Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/14TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6992 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- RENJITH. P.M., PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, CHEMBU P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK.

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM-682 030.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R. RANJITH.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 6992 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ISSUED TO KL-17/B-420. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05/02/2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.6992 of 2015 - Y ====================== Dated this the 5th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-17/B-420 in the route Thalayolaparambu - Kaloor. The timings of the service was last settled on 23.08.2012, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P2 dated 05.02.2015. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P2 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of

W.P.(C) No.6992 of 2015 - Y publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge