T.K.Mariyamma v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 7053 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
T.K.MARIYAMMA, BRANCH MANAGER, THE URUKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., URUKUNNU P.O., EDAMON, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY RESPONDENTS:
1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, O/O.REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, O/O. JOINT REGISTRAR (GENERAL), KOLLAM-691 501.
4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), O/O.THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), PUNALUR-691 305.
5. THE URUKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., URUKUNNU P.O., EDAMON, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 307 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
6. THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, THE URUKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., URUKUNNU P.O., EDAMON, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 307.
7. M.D.SHERLY, CHIEF ACCOUNTANT, NOW WORKING AS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, THE URUKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., URUKUNNU P.O., EDAMON, PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 307.
R5&6 BY ADVS. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR SRI.A.K.RAJESH SRI.VENKATESH GOPI SMT.T.RESHMA R7 BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.7053 of 2015 F -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Kerala Co-operative Arbitration Court. Accordingly, this Court dismisses the writ petition leaving it open for the petitioner to explore the alternative avenues, including that of the Co-operative Arbitration Court.
Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv