High Court of KeralaWP(C)/9830/2013dismissed for default

Prameela Chandran v. Cherppu Range Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Samithi

2015-10-26Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9830 of 2013 (C) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------- PRAMEELA CHANDRAN, AMBALAPULLY HOUSE, CHERUVATHERY, P.O.CHOVOOR THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.LINDONS C.DAVIS RESPONDENTS:

------------------

1. CHERPPU RANGE CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAMITHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER, SRI.P.B.BASI, S/O.P.K.BALAN, PALISSERY HOUSE, PERINGOTTUKARA DESOM, KIZHAKKUMURI VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, LICENSEE NO.TS NO.11/2012-13 AND RUNNING TODDY SHOP IN BUILDING NO.VIII/86, 87 OF AVINISSERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 306.

2. AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AVINISSERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 306.

3. SECRETARY, AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, OFFICE OF THE AVINISSERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, AVINISSERY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 306.

4. EXCISE COMMISSIONER, EXCISE HEAD QUARTERS, NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1.

5. DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003.

6. DISTRICT COLLECTOR COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680 003.

R2,3 BY ADV. SRI.M.N.MANOJ R2,R 3 BY ADV. SRI.V.C.VALSAN R BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN R4,R5 BY ADV. SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 9830 of 2013 (C) ---------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October, 2015.

JUDGMENT

None appears for the petitioner. Despite the fact that the writ petition belongs to the year 2013 and that well in advance this Court has notified that the matter would be taken up today, the petitioner has not chosen to appear before the Court to pursue the case. This Court accordingly holds that the petitioner may not be inclined to pursue the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

/True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

W.P.(C). No.

-2-