← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17362/2006dismissed as infructuous

Sunil Kumar M.D. v. The Kerala Water Authority.

2015-07-23Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2015/1ST SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17362 of 2006 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------

1. SUNIL KUMAR M.D., S/O.DAMODARAN M.K., PUMP OPERATOR, MLAPPURA SOURCE PUMP HOUSE PERUVANTHANAM PANCHAYAT, MATTATHIL HOUSE PARAPUZHA P.O., THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

2. PRAMOD, PUMP OPERATOR, MLAPURA SOURCE PUMP HOUSE PERUVANTHANAM PANCHAYAT, KALLISSERIL HOUSE PALURKAVU P.O., THEKKEMALA PERUVANTHANAM IDUKKI DISTRICT.

3. BINU R., S/O. RAVEENDRA BABU, PUMP OPERATOR, VANDANMEDU PUMP HOUSE RESIDING AT BLOCK NO.75, K.P.COLONY, KALLAR P.O. IDUKKI DISTRICT.

ADDL.4:P.V.KURIAKOSE, PALAT HOUSE, RAJAKUMARI.P.O., IDUKKI - 685 619.

ADDL.4TH PETITIONER IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DT.29.8.2006 IN I.A.NO.12135/2006.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.C.CHACKO(PARATHANAM) SMT.ASHA CHACKO RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALABHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, DIVISIONAL OFFICE KATTAPPANA P.O., KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE PEERMADE P.O., PEERMADE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

W.P.(C).NO.17362/2006

4. AMRUTHARAJ, KARTHIKABHAVAN, VATTAPATHAL, K.K. LINE VAGAMON, PEERMADE TALUK, PIN-685503.

5. MANOJ, PULAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, 35TH MILE, MUNDAKKAYAM EAST PERUVATHANAM P.O., PEERMADE TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT R, BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC, SC, KWA R,R1TO3 BY ADV. SRI.J.KRISHNA KUMAR, SC, KWA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.17362 OF 2006 (P) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been removed from service. Taking note of the submission of counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp