← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/7385/2015disposed of

Joby K.George v. Kerala State Electricity Board

2015-03-09Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/18TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7385 of 2015 (W) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- JOBY K.GEORGE, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O KOSHY, V.TECH CABLE T.V.NETWORK, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN:695003 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN:691 523.

3. CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE OFFICE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN: 695 004.

BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 7385 of 2015 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER WITH THE ELECTRICITY BOARD DATED 28.12.2010.

EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 9.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD DATED 31.12.2014.

EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 27.2.2015.

EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD DATED 25.2.2012.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 7385 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by the retrospective hike in poll rental. The dispute requires to be resolved by the third respondent as per the terms of Ext.P1 agreement. The petitioner has in this regard submitted Ext.P4 representation with the third respondent.

2.

I direct the third respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The coercive steps as against the petitioner shall be put on hold if the pre-revised poll rental arrears are cleared.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd