Ummer v. The Government Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/13TH KARTHIKA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7677 of 2014 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------
1. UMMER KAIPADAMPARAMBATH HOUSE, ATHALLUR P.O., THAVANUR PONNANI.
2. SIVADAS T.V.
KRISHNA NIVAS, ATHALOOR, THAVANOOR PONNANI.
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
4. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.
R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-11-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 7677 of 2014 (H) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE IST PETITIONER ON THE ROUTE KUTTIPURAM - PONNANI VALID UP TO 04/03/2014. EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON THE ROUTE KUTTIPURA - PONNANI VALID UP TO 26/03/2013.
EXHIBIT-P3-TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSAL PUBLISHED AS NOTIFICATION NO. 8153/B1/12/TRA DATED 24/01/2013.
EXHIBIT-P4-TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION G.O.(P) No.3/2014/TRAN. DATED 22/01/2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.7677 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 4th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The scheme impugned in this writ petition has since been modified whereunder the existing permits of the petitioners have been saved. The petitioners have no subsisting grievance therefore since any application for renewal can only be dealt with in accordance with the modified scheme.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj/4.11.15