Abdul Muthu v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11233 of 2012 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ABDUL MUTHU AGED 70 YEARS S/O.MOIDUSAHIB, RAZIYA MANZIL, CHOONDAKKAD KAVASSERY AMSOM DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK.

BY ADVS.SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.SEBIN THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALATHUR POLICE STATION, ALATHUR-678541.

3. MANOJ S/O.ABDUL MUTHU, RAZIYA MANZIL, CHOONDAKKAD KAVASSERY AMSOM, DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK-678543.

4. ABDUL SALAM S/O.BEERAVU, PEECHAMPILLIYIL (H), VAZHAKKALA KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 682030.

5. HAMZA S/O.BAPPU, MOOCHIKKAL (H), OTTAPALAM P.O.

PIN 673101.

6. ABBAS S/O.EBRAHIM, ROYAL BAKERY, ERIMAYUR ALATHUR-678541.

R4 TO 6 BY ADV. SRI.T.K.AJITHKUMAR (VALATH) R4 TO 6 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEVAN R1-2 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 11233 of 2012 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS --------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE PETIION SUBMITTED BY THE PETIIONER BEFORE THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALATHUR ATED 28.4.2012 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS ---------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE sou.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J -------------------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 11233 of 2012 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

Shaffique, J The petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection alleging that the children are threatening him and harassing him.

2. Learned Government Pleader submits that the children had opposed his third marriage with another person, which had given raise to the conflict between them.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, we do not think that any direction as sought for is required to be passed in this writ petition. Hence we dismiss the writ petition. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE sou.6/11/15 // TRUE COPY //