High Court of KeralaWP(C)/7486/2015disposed of

Baby Robert V.V. v. Stateof Kerala

2015-03-094 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/18TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7486 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- BABY ROBERT V.V. AGED 26 YEARS S/O.BHASKARAN, VELLAMVELLY HOUSE, P.O.CHERUVANCHERRY, VIA, CHITTARIPARAMBA, KANNUR - 670 659.

BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ RESPONDENTS ----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3. PATTIAM GRAMAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PATTIAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT CHERUVANCHERRY KANNUR - 670 659.

R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SHERIN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: AD/

WP(C).No. 7486 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 25.01.2015. EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE DRAWING OF PATTIAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT SHOWING PATTIAN AND CHERUVANCHERI AREA.

EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.03.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE AD/

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J --------------------------------------------- WPC No.7486 of 2015 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders Ext.P3 representation.

2. The petitioner is a resident of Pattiam Grama Panchayat. He is aggrieved by the refusal of the Government to effect division of the Pattiam Grama Panchayat. The petitioner submits that he has filed several representations before the first respondent, but no action has been taken so far. According to the petitioner, Ext.P3 representation is now pending consideration. As the limited prayer of the petitioner is only for a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of

WPC No.7486/2015 2 directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard, at the earliest.

sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE css/ true copy P.S.TO JUDGE