High Court of KeralaWP(C)/10212/2013closed

Reghu, S/O.K.K.Jinarajan v. State Of Kerala

2015-01-13Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Ag.Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/23RD POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 10212 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- REGHU, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.K.K. JINARAJAN, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 16, PANCHAVADY COLONY, VYTTILA DESOM, POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001.

2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAVANTHARA POLICE STATION, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM-682 017.

4. PRINCIE, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O. PURUSHOTHAMAN, VADAKKEDATH HOUSE, POOLANI DESOM, MELOOR, MUKUNDAPURAM-680 330.

5. SUDHEEP, AGED 42 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, RESIDING AT CHALIKKAVATTOM, NEAR MANISANKER'S HOUSE, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM-680 020.

R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.R. SYAMKUMAR. R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.C.ANILKUMAR (KALLESSERIL). THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 10212 of 2013 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08-04-2013.

EXT.P2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 08-04-2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 10212 of 2013 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ Petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection alleging harassment and threat by respondents 4 and 5 and their men.

2. An interim order has been passed by this Court on 10.4.2013 directing the police to take appropriate steps in the matter.

3. Learned Government Pleader submits that after the interim order was passed, no untoward incident was reported.

4. Having regard to the fact that after the interim order was passed, no untoward incident was reported, we think that there is no necessity to continue the writ petition.

The writ petition is closed.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.

sou.