High Court of KeralaWP(C)/7685/2015disposed of

A.C. Gnanadas v. State Of Kerala

2015-03-19Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/28TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7685 of 2015 (I) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- A.C. GNANADAS, S/O. AMBBIAH, THALAYAR ESTATE, KAPPI DIVISION, THALAYAR POST, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURESH RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KERALA, MINISTRY FOR WELFARE OF SCHEDULED CAST & BACKWARD CLASSES, GROUND FLOOR, NORTH BLOCK, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1.

2. THE DIRECTOR FOR SCHEDULED CAST DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-1.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT SCHEDULED CAST DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, IDUKKI, MOOLAMATTAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT-683 514.

4. THE SCHEDULED DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DEVIKULAM BLOCK, DEVIKULAM P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 613.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 7685 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 16.12.2014. P2 :

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.1.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

----------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.7685 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the grievance of the petitioner projected in the writ petition has also been highlighted by way of Ext.P2 which is pending consideration before the second respondent. It is stated that the petitioner would be satisfied, if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law in the light of Ext.P1 and such other materials.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the issue on merits.

4. After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 representation preferred by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'three months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

W.P.(C).No.7685 of 2015 Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition, before the second respondent, for further steps.

Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

rkc.