M.A. Joseph v. The Secretary, Kerala State Co-Operative Employees Pension Board
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/21ST PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7879 of 2015 (H) --------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- M.A. JOSEPH, MALIAKKAL HOUSE, PERINGADU, POOVATHOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - PIN 680 508.
BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENTS:
----------------------- 1.
THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2.
THE CHAVAKKAD TALUK RURAL HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, R-344, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PAVARATTY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 507.
3.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GNL.), CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 506.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.7879/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER NO. 550/THR ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.01.2012 IN WP(C) NO. 22767/2010 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
EXHIBIT P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. PB.PPO.550/THR DATED 13.02.2013 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. 1/2001 DATED 13.07.2001 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF FIXATION OF PAY IN THE REVISED SCALE SANCTIONED AS PER GOVERNMENT ORDER GO (P) 220/2005/CO-OP DATED 23.08.2005.
EXHIBIT P6 :
TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26.02.2013 BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.04.2002 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT APPROVING FIXATION OF PAY OF THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 7879 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 12th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The issue pertains to fixation of pension consequent to the reckoning of qualifying service. The petitioner contends that two higher grades already sanctioned deserves to be reckoned. The petitioner has in this regard submitted Ext.P6 representation. 2.
I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation with notice to the petitioner and the second respondent Society. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The pension if revised shall be disbursed to the petitioner promptly.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd