N.Rajagopal v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7915 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------ N.RAJAGOPAL, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANPILLAI, CHENGANATTU MADOM OLD SEMINARY ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.MURALEEKRISHNAN SMT.K.N.RAJANI SMT.T.M.RESHMY RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM - 686 001.
2. THE TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM 686 001.
3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, NATTAKAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM 686 005.
R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. M. MUHAMMED SHAFI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 7915 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 18/7/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER FROM THE NATAKOM GRAMA PANCHAYATH.
P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 18/8/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
-------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 7915 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
"(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction compelling the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit P-1 after affording an opportunity of being heard the petitioner.
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction compelling the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner for leveling his property mentioned in Ext.P-1.
(iii) Issue such other writ, order, or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper while considering the peculiar circumstances of the case."
2.
Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3.
Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. After hearing both sides, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1, in accordance with law. It shall be done, as expeditiously
WP(c). No.7915 of 2015 as possible, and at any rate, within a period of 'six weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the 1st respondent for further steps.
Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
Pn