M/S. Parthas Trivandrum v. Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 7926 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- M/S.PARTHAS TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR.S. ARUJUNAN, P.B. NO. 5716, POWER HOUSE ROAD, TRIVANDRUM- 695 036. BY ADVS.SRI.SUKUMAR NAINAN OOMMEN SMT.AMALA EDWARD SRI.SHERRY SAMUEL OOMMEN RESPONDENT(S) :
---------------------------
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI- 110 001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, ROOM NO. A-403, 4TH FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 003.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 003. BY ADV. SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, S.C THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2015, ALONG WITH W.P.(C).NO.7955 OF 2015 AND W.P.(C).NO.7956 OF 2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.7926 OF 2015 (M) W.P.(C).NO.7955 OF 2015 (T) & W.P.(C).NO.7956 OF 2015 (T) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015
J U D G M E N T
In all these writ petitions, the petitioner challenges the notices issued to him under the Income Tax Act, proposing an assessment, when it is the case of the petitioner that, assessments under the Income Tax Act for the years in question, have already been completed.
When the matters were taken up today, it is submitted by the learned Standing counsel for the respondents in all the writ petitions that, the notices served on the petitioner were served by mistake, consequent to a system error, and the respondents have since decided to withdraw the notices issued to the petitioner. The writ petitions are hence closed as infructuous, by recording the submission of the learned Standing counsel for the respondents that it has been decided to withdraw the notices issued to the petitioner, which are impugned in the writ petitions.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp