High Court of KeralaWP(C)/7940/2015disposed of

K.P. Sasikumar v. The State Of Kerala

2015-03-12Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/21ST PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).NO. 7940 OF 2015 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- K.P. SASIKUMAR AGED 52 YEARS S/O.LATE PANKAJAKSHAN NAIR, KOIPURATHU HOUSE PERUMPETTY P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA BY ADVS.SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.S.PARAMESWARA PRASAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 685 001

2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(REVENUE RECOVERY), MALLAPPALLY,PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 689 594

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PERUMPETTI VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT PIN 689 592 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P.MANGUZHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 7940 OF 2015 (N) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TREATMENT RECORDS OF AMRITHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTRE,KOCHI EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE NO 2014/44410/3 DATED 29-122014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 05-03-2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. ............................................................. Dated this the 12th day of March, 2015 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who is faced with revenue recovery proceedings, has filed Ext.P3 revision petition before the 1st respondent, against Ext.P2 demand notice that was served on him. The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to pass orders in the revision petition, and to keep the recovery steps initiated against him in abeyance, till such time as orders are passed by the 1st respondent on Ext.P3 revision petition.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 revision petition within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.

Recovery proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 demand notice shall be kept in abeyance till such time as orders are passed by the 1st respondent, as directed above, and communicated to the petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns