Jayasree S. v. Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/13TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 8041 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------- JAYASREE S. AGED 52 YEARS W/O.SURESH KUMAR, SREEKARTHIKA, KAVALAPPRA P.O. SHORNUR - 679 523, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.B.GANGESH SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
--------------------------
1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 001.
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SHORNUR - 679 121.
3. DHARMARAJAN S/O.PANANJIKUNNATH PRABHAKARAN, ERUPPE DESOM KARAKKAD AMSOM, OTTAPALAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 101.
4. DANESH KUMAR S/O.PANANJAKUNNATH PRABHAKARAN, ERUPPE DESOM KARAKKAD AMSOM, OTTAPALAM PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 679 101.
R1 AND R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 8041 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 20/12/2012 IN OS NO. 353 OF 2007 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPPALAM. EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 18/02/2015 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2(A): A TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 18/02/2015 ADDRESSSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 26/02/2015 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ NIL /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 8041 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd June, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, CJ.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to respondents 3 and 4, in view of the order, which is being passed.
2. The petitioner has come up with the Writ Petition seeking police protection. The petitioner's case is that there is already adjudication before the Civil Court and a decree was passed in favour of the petitioner's husband. Allegations have been made regarding an incident that took place on 8.2.2015 with regard to which a complaint has also been filed by the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that on a complaint and counter complaint,
WP(C).8041/15 crimes were registered. It is submitted that the above was only a solitary incident and there is no law and order situation or any kind of threat as on date. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that after filing the Writ Petition, no such incident has taken place.
In the above view of the matter, we close the Writ Petition.
ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE vgs3/6/15