C.K.Sujitha v. The District Collector, Ernakulam District

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No.8313 of 2014 (L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER'S:

---------------------- 1.

C.K.SUJITHA,D/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, RESIDING AT CC XX/1937 A,PALLURUTHY,KOCHI-682 006. 2.

C.K.SURAJ,S/O.LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, RESIDING AT CC XX/1937 B,PALLURUTHY,KOCHI-682 006. BY ADVS.SRI.C.U.SANGEETH SMT.AMRITA JAYARAM RESPONDENT'S:

------------------------ 1.

DISTRICT COLLECTOR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION,KAKKANAD,KOCHI-682 020.

2.

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI,KOCHI-682 001.

3.

THE TAHSILDAR,KOCHI TALUK, FORT COCHIN,KOCHI-682 001.

4.

VILLAGE OFFICER,PALLURUTHY VILLAGE OFFICE, KACHERIPADY,PALLURUTHY,KOCHI-682 006.

R1 TO R4 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

WP(C).No.8313 of 2014 (L) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THAT JUDGMENT DTD.19.11.2012.

P2 :

TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.3.12.2012 ALONG WITH CALCULATION STATEMENT.

P3 :

TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE FROM THE BANK OF BARODA DTD.17.3.2014.

P4 :

TRUE COPY OF URGENT NOTICE BEARING NO.B3-6737/06 DTD.14.2.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 8313 of 2014 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of May,2015

J U D G M E N T

------------------------- This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P4 notice. Ext.P4 is the communication issued by the Tahsildar requesting the petitioner to remit building tax and luxury tax.

2.

If the petitioner has any grievance against the liability, the petitioner has to challenge Assessment Order, the petitioner cannot challenge a consequential communication issued to him. With the liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority to challenge the liability, this writ petition is dismissed. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE jm/