← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/8298/2015disposed of

S.Santhosh v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-03-17Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8298 of 2015 (J) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER:

-------------------------- S.SANTHOSH, EMPANELLED MACHINIST, KSRTC REGIONAL WORKSHOP, MAVELIKKARA ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANATHPURAM PIN - 695 023 2.

THE WORKS MANAGER, KSRTC, REGIONAL WORKSHOP MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT PIN - 690 101 BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 8298 of 2015 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF DUTY PASS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER, DATED NIL P1A : COPY OF NATIONAL TRADE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER P1B : COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 22.06.1998 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P1C : COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 28.02.2001 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P1D:

COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 6.7.2010 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P2 :

COPY OF GOVT. ORDER DATED 22.12.2011 P3:

COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 2.9.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 8298 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks regularisation in the services of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation. The petitioner contends that he has been working as a provisional machinist for long. The petitioner has in this regard submitted Ext. P3 representation and places reliance on Ext. P2 Government Order as regards regularisation.

2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE