High Court of KeralaWP(C)/8356/2015disposed of

E.Salim v. The Secretary, Rta, Vatakara

2015-03-17Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/26TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8356 of 2015 (T) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- E.SALIM, EDATHIL HOUSE, P.O ORAVIL, NADUVANNUR KOYILANDY, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK.

RESPONDENT(S):

------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA - 673 101.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RENJITH.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rvs.

WP(C).No. 8356 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------- EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ISSUED TO KL-11/Z 3339. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE RPERESNTATION DATED 11-12-2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------ NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C).No. 8356 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated 17th March, 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No.KL--11 / Z 3339 on the route Kuttiady-Kozhikode. It is contended that subsequent to the allotment of timings to the petitioner, several other services were introduced in the same sector and the timings of several services have also been changed and, therefore, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 request for revision of timings of his service. It is submitted that, last revision of timings of the petitioner was on 13.07.2010. Petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application.

2. If Ext.P2 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the

WP(C).8356/15 respondent shall issue notice of hearing within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment to the petitioner and any other stage carriage operators adversely affected by change in timings sought for by the petitioner and also display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then, consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law and by convening a timing conference at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say that any revision made shall be subject to implementation of D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge Mrcs //True Copy//