← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/8540/2015disposed of

Nandanan v. Secretary

2015-03-18Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/27TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8540 of 2015 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- NANDANAN, PULLANIKKATTIL HOUSE, KOZHIKKOTTIRI, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT :

-------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.8540/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 9/9/2009 P2 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION 30/1/2015.

P3 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.4472/2014 DATED 14/2/2014. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.8540 of 2015 - N ====================== Dated this the 18th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-7-AR/8114 in the route Shornur - Karekkad - Guruvayur. The timings of the service was last alloted on 09.09.2009, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P2 dated 30.01.2015. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P2 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of

W.P.(C) No.8540 of 2015 - N publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge