Biju T.T v. District Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/6TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 8761 of 2015 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- BIJU T.T, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN T.K, TACHOLIL HOUSE, ADIMALI P.O, DEVIKULAM, MANNANKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.VIJAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, IDUKKI - 685 603.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADIMALI - 685 561.
3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADIMALI - 685 561.
4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MUNNAR - 685 612.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 8761 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 :
PHTOOSTAT COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA 804/1998 DATED 9-3-2006.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
========================= W.P.(C) No.8761 of 2015 ============================ Dated this the 27th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents not to stop Homeopathy practice of the petitioner. ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing or compelling the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue Homeopathy practice of the petitioner.
2. The learned Government Pleader submits on instructions that absolutely no instance of harassment is there from the part of the police in any manner with regard to the profession or practice of the petitioner as a Homeopath. It is stated that there was some earlier instance, which required interrogation involving some other issues and the same does not have any connection with regard to the practice of the petitioner as aforesaid. The above submission is recorded. No further orders are called for with regard to the reliefs sought for. The writ petition stands closed accordingly.
Sd/- P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE vdv