← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11468/2013closed

Noufal.K. v. The Superintendent Of Police

2015-11-30Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11468 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

--------------------------

1. NOUFAL K., AGED 33, S/O.MOIDEEN, PUZHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O.MOONNIYOOR SOUTH MALAPPURAM-676311.

2. JOUHARA W/O.NOUFAL K., PUZHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O.MOONNIYOOR SOUTH MALAPPURAM-676311.

3. BIYUMMA, AGED 58, W/O.MOIDEEN, PUZHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O.MOONNIYOOR SOUTH MALAPPURAM-676311.

4. MOIDEEN, AGED 65, PUZHAKKARA HOUSE, P.O. MOONNIYOOR SOUTH MALAPPURAM-676311.

5. MOHAMED T., S/O.KUNJAVA, THIRUTHUMMEL HOUSE, KOOTTALUNGAL HOUSE CHELARI, VELIMUKKU, PIN - 676317.

BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MALAPPURAM-676311.

2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MALAPPURAM-676311.

...2/-

WP(C).No. 11468 of 2013 (G) -2-

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676311.

4. FAHAD S/O.MAMMUDU HAJI, KALLARAKKAL HOUSE, KUNNATHUPARAMBU P.O.MOONNIYOOR SOUTH, MALAPPURAM-676311.

5. RAUF S/O.MAMMUDI HAJI, KALLARAKKAL HOUSE, KUNNATHUPARAMBU P.O.MOONNIYOOR SOUTH, MALAPPURAM-676311.

6. SAKEER S/O.KOMUKUTTY HAJI, PARAMBIL HOUSE MOONNIYOOR SOUTH P.O., MALAPPURAM-676311.

7. HAMSA S/O.NAFEESA, KUTTIYIL HOUSE KUNNATHU PARAMBA, MOONNIYOOR SOUTH P.O.

MALAPPURAM-676311.

8. MOHAMMED KUTTY P., PULIKKAL HOUSE, MOONNIYOOR SOUTH P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 311.

9. JAMSHEED S/O.KOMUKUTTY HAJI, PARAMBIL HOUSE MOONNIYOOR SOUTH P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 311.

10. SHIHAB S/O.KOMUKUTTY HAJI, PARAMBIL HOUSE MOONNIYOOR SOUTH P.O., MALAPPURAM-676 311.

11. MUHAMMED SHAFI S/O.MUHAMED GHOUSE, KYTHAVALAPPIL HOUSE, THIRUR MALAPPURAM DISTRIC-676 311.

R1 TO R3 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR R4 TO R10 BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...3/-

WP(C).No. 11468 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED BY LOCAL AUTHORITY.

EXHIBIT-P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 22.4.2013 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 23.4.2013 BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 24.4.2013 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P5:

TRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 22.4.2013.

EXHIBIT-P6:

COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 2.5.2013.

EXHIBIT-P7:

COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER. EXHIBIT-P8:

COPY OF RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF RESPONDENT NO. 3 DATED 4.5.2013.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------ EXHIBIT R4(1) COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE IST PETITIONER AND THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.4.2013. EXHIBIT R4(2) COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE IST PETITIONER AND THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.4.2013. EXHIBIT R4(3) COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE IST PETITIONER AND THE 7TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.4.2013. EXHIBIT R4(4) COPY OF THE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE IST PETITIONER AND THE 8TH RESPONDENT DATED 12.4.2013. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.11468 of 2013 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

SHAFFIQUE, J.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking police protection, alleging that respondents 4 to 11 were creating obstruction in the matter relating to the construction being undertaken by the petitioners.

2. During the pendency of the writ petition, an interim order has been passed by this Court directing the police to ensure maintenance of law and order.

3. Learned Government Pleader on instruction would submit that during the pendency of the writ petition, no untoward incident has been reported.

Hence we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the police, if any further cause of action arises.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.

ami/ //True copy// P.A. to Judge