K.S.Muhammed v. The Deputy Tahsildar(Rr)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 8904 of 2015 (K) --------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------------ K.S.MUHAMMED, S/O.SAIDALI HAJI, AGED 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT KORAKKOTTIL HOUSE, MUTHUTHALA P.O, PATTAMBI (VIA), PALAKKAD- 679 303 BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD- 679 101
2. THE FARMERS DEBT RELIEF COMMISSIONER, MUDAPPURA LANE, JAGATHY, THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 014 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3. THE MANAGER,STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUTHUTHALA BRANCH, MUTHUTHALA P.O., PALAKKAD -679 303 R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN R3 BY SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC, SBI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 8904 of 2015 (K) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 20.06.2014 P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 02.03.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
******************************************************* W.P.(C) No. 8904 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 19th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner availed an agricultural loan from the third respondent Bank. Consequent upon the non-payment of the loan amount, the Bank has instituted a civil suit and also initiated Revenue Recovery proceedings. In the Revenue Recovery Proceedings, the petitioner's movables are sought to be attached. The petitioner, apprehending attachment, approached this Court. The petitioner submits that he is 75 years old and the movables are part of his livelihood. The petitioner further submits that he has no other means to pay off the entire liability and he is attempting for private sale to discharge the entire liability.
Considering the facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
1. The petitioner shall discharge the entire liability within six months.
2. However, if the petitioner fails to pay the entire liability within six months, the Revenue Authorities are free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.
W.P.(C) No. 8904 of 2015 2
3. If the petitioner is attempting a private sale, the petitioner shall deposit necessary amount for release the document from the Bank.
4. In that event of discharge of the entire liability, the Bank shall release the document to the petitioner. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln