Sukumaran.V.K v. Authorized Officer, Kollam District Co-Operative Bank
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/9TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 8918 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------ SUKUMARAN.V.K., AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.LATE V.K.KUNJU, NANDANAM, CHITTAYAM, PANAYAM P.O., KOLLAM-691601.
BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
1. AUTHORIZED OFFICER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KOLLAM, 691001.
2. MANAGER KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, ANCHALUMMOODU BRANCH, KOLLAM-691001.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR, SC, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 8918 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNITY CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER 7.1.2015.
EXHIBIT-P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 4.11.2013 TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE FROM 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 16.2.2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 8918 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 30th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who had availed a loan from the respondent bank, defaulted in repayment of the same. Consequently, the respondent bank initiated proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, hereinafter referred to as the 'SARFAESI Act', to recover the loan amounts. Ext.P2 is the notice issued to the petitioner under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. In the writ petition, the petitioner impugns the steps initiated by the respondent bank for recovery of the loan amounts. 2.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I note that the sole prayer of the petitioner is to permit him to remit the balance amounts outstanding to the bank in easy installments. Taking into account the plea of financial hardship raised by the petitioner, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:-
-2W.P.(C). No. 8918 of 2015 (i) The total outstanding amount, in respect of the loan, is stated to be Rs.3,95,751/- together with accrued interest. Accordingly, if the petitioner remits the aforesaid amount of Rs.3,95,751/- together with accrued interest in ten equal and successive monthly installments commencing from 20.04.2015, then the recovery steps initiated against him by the respondent bank shall be kept in abeyance.
(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner commits a default in respect of any of the installments, he will lose the benefit of this judgment and the respondent bank will be free to continue the recovery proceedings against him from the stage at which they presently stand.
Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das