High Court of KeralaWP(C)/8924/2015disposed of

Khadeeja v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kozhikode

2015-03-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8924 of 2015 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONERS:

--------------------------

1. KHADEEJA AGED 46 YEARS MULLAPPALLY HOUSE P.O.GURUVAYURAPPAN COLLEGE KOZHIKODE.

2. HAFSA MULLAPPALLY HOUSE P.O.GURUVAYURAPPAN COLLEGE KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 020.

2. C.YUSUF, HMT HOUSE CHANGANACHERRY HOUSE, CEENKAVU AYIKARAPADY P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN. 676 637 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI R RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-032015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 8924 of 2015 (M) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 27-2-2015 EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 27-2-2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 8924 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners have filed Exts.P1 and P2 objections against the proposed revision of timings of the 2nd respondent. The petitioners' prayer is only for consideration of the objections while considering the revision of timings of the 2nd respondent in the timing conference scheduled on 26.03.2015. In such circumstance, if the objections have been filed in original before the authority, necessarily the same shall be considered when the settlement of timings of the 2nd respondent is taken up. Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge