Shaiji K.Jacob v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 8925 of 2015 (M) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
------------ SHAIJI K.JACOB, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.K.K.JACOB, PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER, HIGH SCHOOL, RAMAMANGALAM, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.V.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR.
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM AT KAKKANAD-682 030.
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 673.
4. THE MANAGER, HIGH SCHOOL, RAMAMANGALAM, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 663.
5. THE HEADMASTER, HIGH SCHOOL, RAMAMANGALAM, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 663.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rvs.
WP(C).No. 8925 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
----------------------- EXT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 03-06-2013.
EXT P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1/3443/2013/K.DIS DATED 0707-2014 OF THE DIST. EDL. OFFICER. EXT P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B4/14631/14/K.DIS DATED 12-012015 OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR. EXT P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE GO(RT)NO.5213/2007/G.EDN DATED 15-112007 OF THE GOVERNMENT. EXT P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE GO(MS)NO.139/12/G.EDN DATED 02-05-2012 OF THE GOVERNMENT.
EXT P6 :
TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 04-03-2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------ NIL.
/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.8925 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 20 th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
Petitioner was appointed as Physical Education Teacher in High School, Ramamangalam, an aided school situated in Muvattupuzha as per Ext.P1. Ext.P1 was rejected by the District Educational Officer as per Ext.P2. Assailing Ext.P2, the petitioner filed a statutory revision before the 1st respondent as per Ext.P6. The limited prayer of the petitioner is for an early disposal of Ext.P6 revision by the 1st respondent .
2. In the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P6, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the manager, within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of.
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE sj