← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/12068/2011settled

M.P.Salini v. Narakkal Govt.Servants

2015-10-12Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 PETITIONER : - ---------------------- M.P.SALINI, RTD. SENIOR CLERK, GOVT.SERVICE SAHAKARANA SANGHAM, NJARAKKAL, KOCHAMURIYIL HOUSE, NJARAKKAL.P.O., ERNAKULAM-682 505.

BY ADVS.SMT.S.K.DEVI SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS :- -------------------------

1. NARAKKAL GOVT.SERVANTS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.136, NJARAKKAL.P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 505, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

3. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL), ERNAKULAM-682 016.

4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, (GENERAL), OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), KOCHI-682 001.

5. KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES' PENSION BOARD, P.B.NO.85, KALA NIVAS, T.C.27/156, 157, CHINMAYA HOUSE, KUNNUPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 004, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.JACOB R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.P.GOPAKUMAR R5 BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL,SC,CO-OP.EMP.PENSION BOARD R5 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.MOHANAN, SC BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1 : COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE SUB COMMITTEE OF THE 1st RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER, DATED 6.3.2009. EXHIBIT P1(a) : COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 12.3.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST EXHIBIT P1.

EXHIBIT P1(b) : COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17.3.2009 ISSUED BY THE 1st RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2 : COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 21.10.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1st RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 : COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 17.3.2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3rd RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4:

COPY OF THE INTIMATION GIVEN BY THE 3rd RESPONDENT DATED 3.6.2010.

EXHIBIT P5 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 29.10.2010 OF THE 1st RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS DATED 21.11.2010.

EXHIBIT P7 : COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.11.2010 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1st AND 5th RESPONDENTS. EXHIBIT P8 : COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 18.1.2011 ISSUED BY THE 5th RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P9 : COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 3.3.2011 OF THE 1st RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P9(a): COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 20.03.2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT R1(a) : COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 28.7.2011. EXHIBIT R1(b) : COPY OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE AUDITOR DATED 28.7.2011.

EXHIBIT R1(c) : COPY OF THE ORDER No. CRB 9480/09 DATED 3.6.2010 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR.

EXHIBIT R1(d) : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE DOMESTIC ENQUIRY REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 DATED 23.9.2008. EXHIBIT R1(e) : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE SECTION 65 ENQUIRY REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-07 DATED 15.6.2009. EXHIBIT R1(f) : COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE DEFECTS IN THE AUDIT REPORT FOR THE YEAR 2006-07.

EXHIBIT R1(g) : COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED UNDER SECTION 68 DATED 28.1.2010.

EXHIBIT R1(h) : COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 6.3.2009 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE SUB COMMITTEE.

EXHIBIT R1(i) : COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECRETARY DATED 17.3.2009.

EXHIBIT R1(j) : COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 11.12002. // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 12068 of 2011 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The parties have settled their disputes in the mediation before the Kerala State Mediation and Conciliation Centre and filed a memorandum of agreement dated 01.10.2015 before the Court.

Making the memorandum of agreement entered into by the parties on both sides as part of the record, this Court closes the writ petition since nothing survives further to be adjudicated upon. The terms of settlement will form part of the judgment.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-