High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24995/2003dismissed

P.R.Gopalakrishnan v. The State Of Kerala

2015-03-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Surendra Mohan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/29TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 24995 of 2003 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

-------------------------- P.R.GOPALAKRISHNAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR, AGED 53 YEARS, HEADMASTER, GOVERNMENT L.P.SCHOOL, KALLURMA, EDAPPAL SUB DISTRICT (NOW ON WORKING ARRANGEMENT BLOCK PROGRAMME OFFICER, SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN, PATTAMBI) BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.E.S.ASHRAF SRI.T.V.VIJAYARAJAN RESPONDENTS :

----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM

3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MALAPPURAM

4. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E) KERALA TRIVANDRUM R BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24995 of 2003 (A) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.29/1989-C EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)NO.55/97/G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P3 : COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.73/98/G.EDN. OF -DOEXT.P4 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT INO.P.NO.12393/1999-A EXT.P5 : COPY OF THE G.O.(RT.)NO.457/2002G.EDN. OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P6 : COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)NO.400/87/(141)/FIN. OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P7 : COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.180/91/(100)/FIN. OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P8 : COPY OF THE G.O.(MS)NO.57/91/(89)/FIN.OF THE GOVERNMENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A TO JUDGE AV

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.

------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No.24995 of 2003 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

No representation for the petitioner. Service on R2 to R4 remains incomplete. Though two weeks time was granted on 27/06/2011 to take steps in the correct address by the Registrar Judicial, no steps have been taken so far. There is also no representation, when the matter is taken up today. It is obvious that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting this writ petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed. Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE.