Yathikumar M. v. Kannur University
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/2ND CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9163 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------------- YATHIKUMAR M., AGED 23 YEARS S/O. MURALEEDHARAN, RESIDING AT EMPATHINCHIRA HOUSE NALLURNAD P.O., MANATHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT - 670 645 BY ADVS.SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE SRI.JAI GEORGE RESPONDENTS:
---------------------------- 1.
KANNUR UNIVERSITY THAVAKKARA, CIVIL STATION P.O.
KANNUR - 670 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR 2.
CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS KANNUR UNIVERSITY, THAVAKKARA CIVIL STATION P.O.
KANNUR - 670 002 3.
THE PRINCIPAL GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, MANANTHAVADY NALLURNAD P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT - 670 645 R1 & R2 BY SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SC, KANNUR UNIVERSITY R3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ' ON 23-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9163 of 2015 (U) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM THE DISTRICT HOSPITAL, MANANTHAVADY EXT.P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE ATTENDANCE PROGRESS CERTIFICATE DATED 09.03.2015 PREPARED BY THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT EXT.P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13.03.2015 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 9163 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner contends that he was down with jaundice for one month. Ext. P1 medical certificate issued by the District Hospital is relied on. The petitioner seeks condonation of shortage of attendance on that score. Ext. P3 application is pending consideration with the third respondent. 2.
I direct the third respondent to forward the requisite documents to the second respondent. The needful shall be done within a period of one week after the date of production of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE