Shilesh Divakaran v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2015/5TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9243 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------- SHILESH DIVAKARAN, AGED 47 YEARS EMPANELLED CONDUCTOR, KSRTC, VIKAS BHAVAN DEPOT VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN RESPONDENT(S):
------------------
1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT THIRUVANANTHAPURAMPIN - 695 023.
2. ASSISTANT TRANSPORT OFFICER KSRTC, VIKAS BHAVAN DEPOT, VIKAS BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695 033.
R BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9243 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXT.P-1: TRUE COPY OF DUTY PASS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED NIL. EXT.P-1A: TRUE COPY OF THE CASH RECEIPT DATED 21.10.1993 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER EXT.P-1B: A TRUE COPY OF ATTENDANCE DETAILS DATED 12.4.2013 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, KSRTC, VIKAS BHAVAN EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF GOVT.ORDER DATED 22.12.2011 EXT.P-3: A TRUE COPY OF JUDGEMENT REPORTED IN 2013(2) KLT 258. EXT.P-4: A TRUE COPY OF JUDGEMENT DATED 2.8.2013 IN WPC NO.12882 OF 2013 EXT.P-5: TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 16.8.2013 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.9243 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 26th day of May, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The issue is covered by the judgment dated 28.11.2014 in W.P.(C) No.30691 of 2014. The services of the petitioner are therefore liable to be regularised in the wake of Ext.P1B attendance details and Ext.P2 Government Order. Ext.P5 order negativing regularisation is accordingly quashed in the circumstances.
2. The respondents are directed to regularise the services of the petitioner within a period of two months.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.