High Court of KeralaWP(C)/9263/2015disposed of

Subish.K.M v. State Of Kerala

2015-04-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/18TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9263 of 2015 (G) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SUBISH K.M., S/O.LATE MOHANAN K.S., KAIMPARAMBIL, PULLOOT VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR-686 663.

BY ADV. SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LABOUR DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

3. THE CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR, KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 036.

R1 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR. R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.ROY CHACKO, SC.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 9263 of 2015 (G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1TRUE COPY OF THE FAMILY MEMBERSHIP CERTIFICATE OF SRI.MOHANAN K.S.

P2TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH COVERING LETTER.

P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 15.05.2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P4TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10.03.2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

==================================== W.P.(C)No.9263 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 8th day of April, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the son of an abkari worker, who died on 30.4.2011. Petitioner seeks consideration under a welfare scheme introduced by the Government to employ the dependants of the abkari workers. Petitioner is said to have submitted an application as early as on 6.8.2012 before the third respondent. No response having been received, there is a further application filed at Ext.P4 dated 10.3.2015. Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 submits that consideration has to be made by the first respondent and not by the officers of the Board. In such circumstance, the third respondent shall forward the said application to the first respondent, within a period of two weeks from today and the first respondent

W.P.(C)No.9263 of 2015 -:2:- shall consider the same, in accordance with the terms of the Scheme, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the application.

Writ petition is disposed off.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

sl.