S. Selvanose v. Union Of India (UOI)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/3RD CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9319 of 2015 (L) ------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:
--------------------------
1. S. SELVANOSE (EMP.CODE NO.2026) CHARGEMAN TERUMOPENPOL PVT.LTD., BLOOD BAG FACTORY PULIYARAKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. R.SREEKUMAR (EMP.CODE NO.2063) CHARGEMAN TERUMOPENPOL PVT.LTD., BLOOD BAG FACTORY PULIYARAKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.MOHANAN SMT.I.VINAYAKUMARI SRI.C.P.SABARI RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) BHAVISHANIDHI BHAVAN, PATTOM PALACE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695004.
3. TERUMOPENPOL PVT.LTD.
REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR PULIYARAKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 R1 BY ADVS. SMT.SINDHUMOL.T.P., CGC SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL R2 BY SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 9319 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.11.2011 IN W.P.(C). NO. 6643/2007 P2 :
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.03.2013 IN W.A. NO. 1137/2012 P3 :
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.02.2015 IN W.P.(C). NO. 5446/2015 P4 :
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.06.2014 IN W.P.(C). NO. 8298/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 9319 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The issue is covered by Ext. P3 judgment in W.P.(C). No. 5446/2015. The directions therein will govern the present case also. The respondents are entitled to extend the benefits to the petitioners accordingly.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE